文章编号：1672-3104(2015)04-0006-07

摘 要： 马克思的晚期著作中是否弱化了主体性，过多强调了客体性，一直是学术界争论的焦点之一。西方学者奈格里从主体政治的角度解读马克思的《1857—1858年经济学手稿》，认为马克思晚期存在主体性思想的断裂。其实，奈格里因为没有理解马克思对资本主义客观矛盾的分析，而过度地诠释了马克思在《1857—1858年经济学手稿》中的主体性。在马克思的晚期著作中，主体性并没有从他的视野中隐退，反而更加隐秘地蕴含在他对资本主义的内在矛盾的分析中。

关键词： 奈格里；《〈大纲〉超越马克思的马克思》；马克思；主体性

Abstract: It is the subject of academic debate whether Marx’s later books weaken the subjectivity or strengthen the objectivity. Western scholar Negri, by unscrambling the 1857—1858Economical Manuscriptfrom the standard point of subjective politics, holds that a breakage of subjectivity exists in Marxist thoughts in his later life. Actually, Negri fails to understand Marx’s analysis of capitalist objective contradictions, and instead relies too much on the subjectivity of Marx’s 1857-1858Economical Manuscript. In Marx’s later books, the subjectivity did not fade from his vision, but instead became more implied in the analysis of capitalistic objective internal contradictions.